[Solved]-Getting "Cannot call a class as a function" in my React Project-Reactjs

If you're on Node JS and you're seeing this error in a Class you've added to support a Cucumber test, it's because Cucumber will automatically try to run anything that exports a function, and NodeJS internally converts a Class to a function.

So instead of this:

module.exports = MyClass;

do this:

module.exports.MyClass = MyClass;

Then, when you import it into your steps file, do it like this:

let MyClass = require("myclass.js").MyClass;

This way you're not exporting a function. Read more here.

For me it was a wrong import of a reducer in the rootReducer.js. I imported container instead of reducer file.

Example

import settings from './pages/Settings';

But sure it should be

import settings from './pages/Settings/reducer';

Where settings directory contains following files actions.js, index.js, reducer.js.

To check it you can log reducers arg of the assertReducerShape() function from the redux/es/redux.js.

I have also run into this, it is possible you have a javascript error inside of your react component. Make sure if you are using a dependency you are using the new operator on the class to instantiate the new instance. Error will throw if

this.classInstance = Class({})

instead use

this.classInstance = new Class({})

you will see in the error chain in the browser

at ReactCompositeComponentWrapper._constructComponentWithoutOwner

that is the giveaway I believe.

In my case i wrote comment in place of Component by mistake

I just wrote this.

import React, { Component } from 'react';

  class Something extends Component{
      render() {
          return();
     }
  }

Instead of this.

import React, { Component } from 'react';

  class Something extends comment{
      render() {
          return();
     }
  }

it's not a big deal but for a beginner like me it's really confusing. I hope this will be helpfull.

In my case, using JSX a parent component was calling other components without the "<>"

 <ComponentA someProp={someCheck ? ComponentX : ComponentY} />

fix

<ComponentA someProp={someCheck ? <ComponentX /> : <ComponentY />} />

Another report here: It didn't work as I exported:

export default compose(
  injectIntl,
  connect(mapStateToProps)(Onboarding)
);

instead of

export default compose(
  injectIntl,
  connect(mapStateToProps)
)(Onboarding);

Note the position of the brackets. Both are correct and won't get caught by either a linter or prettier or something similar. Took me a while to track it down.

In my case, I accidentally put component name (Home) as the first argument to connect function while it was supposed to be at the end. duh.

This one -surely- gave me the error:

export default connect(Home)(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)

But this one worked -surely- fine:

export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(Home)

This occured when I accidentally named my render function incorrectly:

import React from 'react';

export class MyComponent extends React.Component {
  noCalledRender() {
    return (
      <div>
        Hello, world!
      </div>
    );
  }
}

My instance of this error was simply caused because my class did not have a proper render method.

Actually all the problem redux connect. solutions:

Correct:

export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(PageName)

Wrong & Bug:

export default connect(PageName)(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)

In my scenario I was attempting to use hot reloading on a custom hook (not sure why, probably just muscle memory when creating components).

const useCustomHook = () => {
    const params = useParams();
    return useSelector(
        // Do things
    );
};

// The next line is what breaks it
export default hot(module)(useCustomHook);

The correct way

const useCustomHook = () => {
    const params = useParams();
    return useSelector(
        // Do things
    );
};

export default useCustomHook;

Apparently you can't hot reload hook 😅 😂

In my case I accidentally called objectOf

static propTypes = {
    appStore: PropTypes.objectOf(AppStore).isRequired
}

Instead of instanceOf:

static propTypes = {
    appStore: PropTypes.instanceOf(AppStore).isRequired
}

For me, it was because I'd accidentally deleted my render method !

I had a class with a componentWillReceiveProps method I didn't need anymore, immediately preceding a short render method. In my haste removing it, I accidentally removed the entire render method as well.

This was a PAIN to track down, as I was getting console errors pointing at comments in completely irrelevant files as being the "source" of the problem.

I had a similar problem I was calling the render method incorrectly

Gave an error:

render = () => {
    ...
}

instead of

correct:

render(){
    ...
}

I had it when I did so :

function foo() (...) export default foo

correctly:

export default  () =>(...);

or

const foo = ...
export default foo

For me it happened because I didn't wrap my connect function properly, and tried to export default two components

I faced this error when I imported the wrong class and referred to wrong store while using mobx in react-native.

I faced error in this snippet :

import { inject, Observer } from "mobx-react";

@inject ("counter")
@Observer

After few corrections like as below snippet. I resolved my issue like this way.

import { inject, observer } from "mobx-react";

@inject("counterStore")
@observer

What was actually wrong,I was using the wrong class instead of observer I used Observer and instead of counterStore I used counter. I solved my issue like this way.

I experienced this when writing an import statement wrong while importing a function, rather than a class. If removeMaterial is a function in another module:

Right:

import { removeMaterial } from './ClaimForm';

Wrong:

import removeMaterial from './ClaimForm';

In file MyComponent.js

export default class MyComponent extends React.Component {
...
}

I put some function related to that component:

export default class MyComponent extends React.Component {
...
}

export myFunction() {
...
}

and then in another file imported that function:

import myFunction from './MyComponent'
...
myFunction() // => bang! "Cannot call a class as a function"
...

Can you spot the problem?

I forgot the curly braces, and imported MyComponent under name myFunction!

So, the fix was:

import {myFunction} from './MyComponent'

I received this error by making small mistake. My error was exporting the class as a function instead of as a class. At the bottom of my class file I had:

export default InputField();

when it should have been:

export default InputField;

This is a general issue, and doesn't appear in a single case. But, the common problem in all the cases is that you forget to import a specific component (doesn't matter if it's either from a library that you installed or a custom made component that you created):

import {SomeClass} from 'some-library'

When you use it later, without importing it, the compiler thinks it's a function. Therefore, it breaks. This is a common example:

imports

...code...

and then somewhere inside your code

<Image {..some props} />

If you forgot to import the component <Image /> then the compiler will not complain like it does for other imports, but will break when it reaches your code.

Looks like there're no single case when this error appears.

Happened to me when I didn't declare constructor in statefull component.

class MyComponent extends Component {

    render() {
        return <div>Test</div>;
    }
}

instead of

class MyComponent extends Component {

    constructor(props) {
        super(props);
    }

    render() {
        return <div>Test</div>;
    }
}

Post.proptypes = {

}

to

Post.propTypes = {

}

someone should comment on how to monitor such error in a very precise way.

Two things you can check is,

class Slider extends React.Component {
    // Your React Code
}

Slider.propTypes = {
    // accessibility: PropTypes.bool,
}

• Make sure that you extends React.Component
• Use propTypes instead of prototype (as per IDE intellisense)

For me it was because i used prototype instead of propTypes

class MyComponent extends Component {

 render() {
    return <div>Test</div>;
  }
}

MyComponent.prototype = {

};

it ought to be

MyComponent.propTypes = {

};

Mostly these issues occur when you miss extending Component from react:

import React, {Component} from 'react'

export default class TimePicker extends Component {
    render() {
        return();     
    }
}

You have duplicated export default declaration. The first one get overridden by second one which is actually a function.

I experienced the same issue, it occurred because my ES6 component class was not extending React.Component.

For me, it was ComponentName.prototype instead of ComponentName.propTypes. auto suggested by Phpstorm IDE. Hope it will help someone.

Happened to me because I used

PropTypes.arrayOf(SomeClass)

instead of

PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.instanceOf(SomeClass))

tl;dr

If you use React Router v4 check your <Route/> component if you indeed use the component prop to pass your class based React component!

More generally: If your class seems ok, check if the code that calls it doesn't try to use it as a function.

Explanation

I got this error because I was using React Router v4 and I accidentally used the render prop instead of the component one in the <Route/> component to pass my component that was a class. This was a problem, because render expects (calls) a function, while component is the one that will work on React components.

So in this code:

<HashRouter>
    <Switch>
        <Route path="/" render={MyComponent} />
    </Switch>
</HashRouter>

The line containing the <Route/> component, should have been written like this:

<Route path="/" component={MyComponent} />

It is a shame, that they don't check it and give a usable error for such and easy to catch mistake.

For me it was because I forgot to use the new keyword when setting up Animated state.

eg:

fadeAnim: Animated.Value(0),

to

fadeAnim: new Animated.Value(0),

would fix it.

For me it happened when I forgot to write extends React.Component at the end. I know it's not exactly what YOU had, but others reading this answer can benefit from this, hopefully.